Leader or Manager?

...because there is a difference you know. A big difference. and not recognising this and where each comes into play could make or break your business. Of course, you really need be both, but its vital to recognise the difference. Sometimes when things go wrong we naturally ask why did such and such happen or so and so let me down? Did we manage the situation badly or did we fail to demonstrate effective leadership? So what's the difference? OK, well, the first its probably a good starting point to define the two terms. A leader is someone who provides direction, vision and guidance. A person who can point the way forward along a path of achieving a set of goals. A manager provides more hands-on management. Rather than focussing on goals, a manager helps people to fulfil their employment responsibilities with as much success as possible. A successful business needs both, I'd suggest. SMEs in particular often need to look to their owners to provide both management and leadership and this is when problems can occur because this combination isn't often found naturally in many people. However, with a bit of work, the skill-sets for both can be developed, and this allows a transactional relationship between the two to develop. In other words, its possible to learn to be able to switch between the two when running your business. It's important to make this developmental leap because otherwise your business might suffer.

 If you are only a manager  - Your vision might be too myopic
                                          - You struggle to adapt to changing operating conditions
                                          - Your competition might overtake you

 If you are only a leader     - Day to day operations might struggle
                                         - profit margins could slip
                                         - Vision might be too complex
                                         - Purchasing fails and customers leave you.

 So weather you veer to one side or the other, be aware of your shortcomings. Put procedures in place to ensure everyday tasks get done and employee confidence in your business remains high. Talk to your people and share your vision for the business. Ask their opinions and listen to them, and to your customers. Keep your vision simple and sell it to your people, and maintain your focus on this vision.

 Sometimes, keeping your feet firmly on the ground will actually help you to fly higher!

 ( image from http://businessphereconsulting.com/how-to-be-a-better-leader-what-to-do-to-be-a-good-manager/       Another great article on manager or leader)
Posted on 04:54 by Rubysfuture and filed under | 0 Comments »

Social bookmarking -

Which bookmarking sites do you use? The choice is getting ever wider and there appear to be new sites appearing almost on a weekly basis. The big news story from 2012 was probably Pinterest but others are creeping up on the inside. Twitter still emerges as everyone's favourite bookmarking site, combining lively social networking with the ability to group users and save favourite tweets. This post over on Brian Boyer's blog has a few old favourites and a few new surprises... The pic is from the Marcofolio.net site, which also has a few good things to say about social bookmarking. So...which ones do you use?
Posted on 05:21 by Rubysfuture and filed under | 0 Comments »

Middle management and the curse of micro-management...


Micro-management is the scourge of productivity and staff development in all industries or business, either private or public sector. Period. Micro-managers can take a forward looking organisation with good visionary leadership at the top and keen willing staff looking to improve and progress, and turn it and them into static and unmotivated organisation drifting rudderless on an increasingly stormy business ocean.
And its a common phenomenon, this micro-management. It usually indicates a lack of confidence, an unwillingness to lead change for fear of risk-taking, insecurity and therefore a lack of trust in the team doing the grunt work. The problem can be that many leaders and senior managers fail to spot the micro-manager in their middle-management teams, and the micro-manager certainly tries to hide their methodology, and therefore, if a job (of sorts) is appearing to be being done, than the trait can be hard to spot. Its almost as if the weak manager can't afford to let the boss see this weakness any more than he or she can allow the team room to manoeuvre or freedom in their allotted tasks.

In this day and age, organisational hierarchies are getting flatter and flatter, with decision-making devolved from traditional top-down levels of organisation to a more project-based responsibility. Of course, there’s a delicious irony with this and this is younger career-oriented ambitious folk, who are stoking the pressure for hierarchical change do themselves expect recognition and promotion as a reward for the work they do. Extrapolate this out over a forty year working career and at a promotion every two or three years, that's between sixteen and twenty steps ‘up’ the corporate ladder. In an ever flattening organisational hierarchy, those steps may be rapidly disappearing, leaving many senior mangers and HR directors with a bit of a headache !

Devolving responsibility to project management level, as I’ve already said, is the way which many businesses are going, however, this approach is not without its problems. Does this result in a lack of overall strategic leadership? will there be competing demands for senior ,management time from project managers eager to be noticed ? and will this looser structure really appeal to everyone, most of whom have been brought up in a command/control structure? Maybe not. For as the reins of perceived power loosen up, very often the response is confusion, uncertainty, lowering levels of morale, and even grumblings of leadership ‘vacuum’. The signs might be quite overt, such as arguing and power struggles, or less overt such as lower productivity and increased sickness absence. Usually a lack of leadership is blamed for these organisational woes, but maybe its not a lack of, but the wrong style of leadership which is to blame in such cases.Maybe, just maybe, its leadership being practiced in the ‘old style’ and grafted on to a new set of operating circumstances rather than adapted for times of change, that is the real culprit in these situations. To take this a stage further, perhaps middle managers are clinging to their traditional styles of management in order to cause change to fail and so preserve the status quo. And so we see that in these cases and many others like them, its the leadership ‘skills’ being practiced which are actually stifling change.

As a leader, its your responsibility to develop your staff, strengthening your teams. The most important job of a leader is to create more leaders, not gather followers. So how can you do this effectively if your view of your teams' strengths and weaknesses and overall performance is blocked by micro-management ?

Here are the four steps to beat the micro-manager, build effective teams of well managed people and develop the leadership capacity of your organisation..

1. Aim to build up channels of communication. Paulo Freire, the education theorist once wrote that without dialogue there can be no communication, and that without communication, there can be no education. So dialogue within your organisation is essential. Encourage this dialogue by having an 'open door' policy. Let everyone know that they can come and see you for a talk, or just pass the time of day with a brief chat. That they can bring their concerns to you, and that you will listen. And talk to everyone without passing either comment or judgement. Active listening is the key to getting folk to open up to you, but its important not to make decisions and communicate them to people in ways which will subvert the business hierarchy and undermine your middle managers.

2. Have the courage to address the problem. If you don't deal with it firmly and decisively, the culture of micro-management will become ingrained in your organisational hierarchy as an acceptable way to do business. So invest in your middle managers. Mentor them and support them by modelling good business and management practice. Allow them time to change and room for trial and error. They will fail as much as they succeed at first, but given the time, spacer and encouragement, they will change. Let them no that its ok to fail, because we all learn from failure, and more importantly, behaviours change because of failure.
Identify potential problems and issues by listening to them talk about their teams. Listen out especially for third person pronouns in these conversations because this is a common way that a micro-manager separates themselves from their team's performance or lack of achievement.

3. Develop all your people. Despite the challenges posed by micro-management, do not let it affect your staff development programmes. High quality training need not be expensive. Use your contacts and professional learning networks to support you in this. They nay be able to help by offering workshops and training, and of course, you will be able to reciprocate. Remember, the role of a leader is to create more leaders, so be on the look out for potential in people. The early bird catches the worm, so they say. So be on your guard and try to spot the micro-manager before the behaviour becomes an issue, and starts to affect productivity, and above all, and even though you are busy with a thousand and one things to do, avoid the temptation to think that if you can't see managers with problems, that there is no problem. Good quality training is the key to avoiding this pitfall. Provide the resources and be creative with training and development budgets as there are many cheap ways of motivating and developing staff and managers. Give your managers time, resources, confidence and encouragement.

4. Have confidence in your people. Expect them to overcome their weaknesses. After all, people micro-manage because they fear the consequences of failure due to giving their staff freedom, so give your middle managers time to change and room for trial and error (see point 2 above). Staff are not free if they don't understand their role in the business, have an interest in it's success, and just what is necessary to achieve that success, so convince your managers that their teams can do the job and put courage into them to give their people the freedom to get on with their work without the dead hand of micro-management constantly on their shoulders. Your managers will know that you expect them to create a positive working environment and atmosphere for their teams, and the business will be all the better for that.

If you persevere and show persistence, most managers can be encouraged out of their micro-management ways. However, where you encounter the odd one who can't, decisive and firm action is required to remove the problem before it spreads and becomes institutionalised. Where you allow a culture of micro-management to become embedded in an organisation, only those who need to be micro-managed will remain there. The rest will be off to pastures new very quickly; to an organisation that allows its employees to flourish and succeed.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Posted on 05:46 by Rubysfuture and filed under | 0 Comments »

Do you need to spend more on Social media?

The attraction of social media for many is the low-cost entry. A few tweets and Facebook posts cost nothing but time. But to garner any sort of return on this time, your social media output needs to be refined and engaging. Its not enough to simply post messages and broadcast your news and products. You need to engage in conversations because its difficult to build up a presence on line without this. Of course, creating a buzz on line demands a commitment to investing the effort involved in cultivating and building a following. So, would you invest time and money in this? Spending hard-won profit on a social media specialist might be expensive but the return might also be well worth the investment. Because you can't do this half-heartedly, it needs a certain level of input, and this means you've got to put out to get in. Here's a great little blog post on social media marketing spending...
Posted on 08:46 by Rubysfuture and filed under , , , , , , , , , , | 0 Comments »

LinkedIn- why 100 million users can't be wrong..

A great blog post from Robert Clay about The power of LinkedIn

I've certainly found it useful, particularly in South Africa. Any thoughts?


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Posted on 02:15 by Rubysfuture and filed under | 1 Comments »

The fall and fall of the search engine

More than 100 million less searches carried out on search engines in the UK fromJuly-August. 40 million less searches carried out August-September. So what's happening? the rise and rise of social media, that's what. Because the increasing trend for those in the know is to find the answers and information they're looking for on the social web. Although Google remains the king of all search methods, its lead is gradually being eroded by the likes of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
So what is the real significance of this shift? Those in the know say its this; Social media is becoming more and more important in driving traffic to websites that search engine optimisation, and it might be that the days of search engine optimisation (SEO) are slipping into the past. Is it worth businesses spending hard earned cash on SEO when there might not be any return on this investment?

Probably not. Indeed, it all points towards money spent on social media being a far better bet.
Posted on 10:37 by Rubysfuture and filed under , , , , , , | 0 Comments »

Social metrics-a science or still an art?


There's always a lot of talk about social media and the bottom line. Just how do you effectively measure the ROI when looking at your social media costs. Although its often said that social media engagement is a necessity rather than a luxury these days, its still important to be able to justify those Pounds, Rands and Dollars spent on social media.

So how do you do it? is social media still rather more art than science? or can we nail it down with the metrics? So-called 'soft' indicators such as engagement relate to the numbers of followers on Twitter, or 'likes' on Facebook are cited by many as indicators of success. But only twelve percent of users and sixteen percent of social media consultants can cite bottom line improvement. These figures are perhaps subjective but maybe that's why art trumps science, at least at the moment. Or perhaps it always will as fickle social media consumers hop from channel to channel depending upon the latest fashion. We've seen the fall from grace of former behemoths like MySpace and BeBo, as well as start-ups which fail to set the world on fire, like the recently closed Scoville...

Have a look at this article for a closer look at the stats.
And if you want some more advice on social media measurement, there's a good article here from Brass Tack Thinking.

(image from ivisitorguide.blogspot.com )
Posted on 11:40 by Rubysfuture and filed under , , , , , , , | 0 Comments »